Skip to content
Sígueme.Magazine
Donate

Follow us

“Come, follow me.” — Matthew 4:19

Español

Did Jesus rename Saul in Damascus?

Acts 13:9 uses both names at once, Saul and Paul. The change in usage is made by Luke, not Jesus.

By Samuel Ibarra · Sana Doctrina
· 3 min read
Did Jesus rename Saul in Damascus?
Photo: mori dad / Pexels

Did Jesus change Saul's name on the road to Damascus? The verdict is myth. In Acts 13:9 Luke writes "Saul, who was also called Paul" (ESV) and from there uses the second name, when the mission advances toward the Gentiles.

The text uses both names at once

Acts never narrates a name change. After Damascus, Luke still calls him Saul (Acts 9:17, 9:19). The Holy Spirit also: "Set apart for me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them" (Acts 13:2, ESV). And Paul himself recalls that the voice spoke to him in Hebrew with that name (Acts 26:14).

What changes in Acts 13:9 is the narrator's pen. Saul is his Hebrew name, from the tribe of Benjamin (Philippians 3:5). Paul is his Greek and Latin name —Paulus—, the one that served him in the Greco-Roman world.

«It wasn't the label, it was the owner.»

— Samuel Ibarra

Among diaspora Jews and Roman citizens, it was common to have two names, sometimes three. Luke begins to use the second just when the mission crosses to Cyprus and opens to the Gentiles (Acts 13:9, 13:13). No one ordered it: it was the decision of the one writing. That's why Saul and Paul are not the before and after of two different men, but the two passports of the same missionary.

Why it sounds so believable

Because the Bible does have name changes. Abram became Abraham (Genesis 17:5), Sarai to Sarah (Genesis 17:15), Jacob to Israel (Genesis 32:28) and Simon to Peter (Matthew 16:18). With that mold, "Saul the persecutor, Paul the apostle" fits perfectly. It's a sticky illustration.

From there it jumps to sermons, cell group studies, short devotionals and social media phrases like "God changes your name when He changes your heart." Almost no one invents it: it's copied from pulpit to pulpit without returning to the text. There's no bad intention, there's haste.

Coalición por el Evangelio published an article by Greg Lanier that responds to the myth from the passage itself. To detect similar claims, three questions are enough: does the passage say it or am I adding it? Does that detail appear elsewhere in Scripture or only in the illustration? Can I show the exact verse?

If the data is not in the text, it is not teaching: it is decoration. And decoration sticks faster than exegesis, especially in thirty-second videos.

What did change in Damascus

It wasn't the label, it was the owner. The same man, with the same two names, stopped persecuting Christ and began preaching Him. Years later he wrote: "But whatever gain I had, I counted as loss for the sake of Christ" (Philippians 3:7, ESV).

The Bible does promise a new name, but not in Damascus: it is Christ's promise to the one who conquers (Revelation 2:17). That name you don't choose, He gives it.

This week, before repeating an illustration that sounds good, open the passage and read it completely. If someone taught you that Saul became Paul by divine decree, share the text with them calmly: there are corrections that are also an act of love. What other biblical phrase have you heard so many times that you no longer check it?

Sources

Share this story

Follow us on social media

@SiguemeMagazine everywhere: videos, daily news and community.